Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 19:48): Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 19:48):Is it considered bad practice to reexport a few symbols from a stdlib module from your module if the intent is to provide the full API in your module and not leak implementation details?
Sukera (Jul 07 2022 at 19:49):is it exported from the stdlib already?
Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 19:49):Yes, in this case, just LinearAlgebra.norm
Sukera (Jul 07 2022 at 19:59):then I'd say it's fine, as long as you don't inadvertently create a naming conflict
Fredrik Ekre (Jul 07 2022 at 20:13):Everyone does it, but I would recommend against it -- by exporting the name like that you take on responsibility for that function. For example, if you export LinearAlgebra.norm, then my code will work without loading LinearAlgebra myself. This is fine until LinearAlgebra.norm changes behavior and my code breaks.
Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 20:16):That makes sense, and it is one of my pet peeves with Lisp. I don't even know why I am asking now that I realize Julia doesn't have any provisions for shadowing symbols, only bindings.
Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 20:17):In Lisp I would just shadow the original symbol, but symbols are not interned into separate module lookup table namespaces like they are in Lisp.
Michael Fiano (Jul 07 2022 at 20:17):So I will refrain from doing that.
Brenhin Keller (Jul 07 2022 at 22:41):Fredrik Ekre said:
Everyone does it, but I would recommend against it -- by exporting the name like that you take on responsibility for that function. For example, if you export
LinearAlgebra.norm, then my code will work without loadingLinearAlgebramyself. This is fine untilLinearAlgebra.normchanges behavior and my code breaks.
Hadn't thought about it much, but now that you mention it I think I only ever reexport from another package when I control both packages
Notification Bot (Jul 07 2022 at 23:20):Michael Fiano has marked this topic as resolved.
Last updated: Nov 22 2024 at 04:41 UTC